Earthquake-induced landslide, a cascading hazard in hilly regions, can substantially increase the damaging effects of an earthquake. This necessitates performance evaluation of buildings situated in hilly regions under the effects of landslide-only and landslides following earthquakes. In this study, the performance of two commonly observed hillside building configurations is assessed—namely, step-back and split foundation—subjected to the above-mentioned multi-hazard scenarios using an uncoupled approach. The uncertainty in the soil properties that influence the landslide-induced forces is considered based on laboratory tests of soil samples collected from active landslide sites and an existing database of landslide events. Three-dimensional hillside buildings are analysed for uphill-side landslide scenarios by performing force-controlled non-linear static analyses. Further, a suite of earthquake ground motions is scaled to a predefined intensity level, and then non-linear time history analyses are performed to obtain the damaged state of the buildings prior to assessing the landslide response. It is observed that the earthquake loading history and its direction of excitation significantly affect the response of hillside buildings to a landslide following an earthquake. Further, the step-back building is observed to be more vulnerable to landslide damage when compared to its split foundation counterpart for a given uphill-side landslide scenario.

Concrete Structures; Earthquakes; Hillside Building; Landslides Multi-Hazard Performance Assessment; Uncertain Soil Properties